The same technology, pointed in opposite directions
Text to speech has two very different uses, and it helps to know which one you need before comparing apps.
Reading for you. You have something to read: a report, a chapter, a long article. You would rather hear it, perhaps faster than you could read it. The audio is for your ears only, and you may never listen to it twice. This is what Speechify is for. Its App Store listing talks about listening to docs, articles, PDFs and email, snapping a picture of a printed page to hear it, and syncing a library across devices.
Speaking for you. You have something to say: a hook for a video, a product description, a story. You want a finished audio file in a voice you chose, to put in front of an audience. The audio is the product. This is what Voice Labs is for.
Most disappointment with text to speech apps comes from choosing one kind when you needed the other.
Where the two overlap
Both apps highlight text in sync with the audio, and both give you a choice of natural-sounding voices. If you only want to hear how a paragraph you wrote sounds, either will do.
Where Voice Labs fits better
- You care which voice it is. Voice Labs has 370+ voices with distinct characters: a warm storyteller, a soothing meditation voice, a drill sergeant. For a voiceover, the character of the voice is half the result.
- You want to direct the performance. Stability, similarity and speed sliders, and Natural, Narration and Expressive presets, change how a line is delivered.
- You need the audio as a file. Save it or share it straight into your editor.
- You want to start from your own voice. The Voice Changer converts a recording into any library voice.
Where Speechify fits better
- Your source is a document. Speechify is built to open PDFs, books and articles. Voice Labs is not.
- You read a lot. Speed listening and a synced library matter when you listen for hours a week.
- You want it on your computer too. Its listing describes syncing between desktop and mobile.
Can you use both?
Yes, and plenty of people would have a reason to. One reads to you on the commute; the other makes the narration for the video you publish in the evening. They do not get in each other’s way.